added two more qna to the faq
This commit is contained in:
parent
e69ac99290
commit
5ee9f2d2d9
24
README.md
24
README.md
|
@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ something (reading an article, watching a movie). Furthermore automatic setting
|
|||
of status always implies an impact on your privacy. (Are you sure you want
|
||||
everybody in your contact list to know that you have been using your computer at
|
||||
4am?!)
|
||||
|
||||
In the past status has been used to judge the likelihood of whether or not your
|
||||
messages are being read. This is no longer necessary. With Chat Markers
|
||||
(XEP-0333, supported by Conversations since 0.4) we have the ability to **know**
|
||||
|
@ -114,10 +115,33 @@ With carbon messages (XEP-0280, supported by Conversations since 0.1) this is no
|
|||
longer necessary. Using priorities to route OTR messages isn't pratical either
|
||||
because they are not changeable on the fly. Metrics like last active client
|
||||
(the client which sent the last message) are much better.
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunatly these modern replacement for lagecay XMPP featurs are not widely
|
||||
adopted. However Conversations should be an instant messanger for the future and
|
||||
instead of making Conversations compatible with the past we should work on
|
||||
implementing new, improved technologies into other XMPP clients as well.
|
||||
|
||||
Making these status and priority optional isn't a solution either because
|
||||
Conversations is trying to get rid of old behaviours and set an example for
|
||||
other clients.
|
||||
|
||||
####Conversations is missing a certain feature
|
||||
I'm open for new feature suggestions. You can use the issue tracker on github.
|
||||
Please take some time to browse through the issues to see if someone else
|
||||
already suggested it. Be assured that I read each and every ticket. If I like it
|
||||
I will leave it open untill it's implemented. If I don't like it I will close
|
||||
it. (Usually with a short comment). If I don't comment on an feature request
|
||||
thats probably I good sign because this means I agree with you. Commenting with
|
||||
+1 on either open or closed issues wont change my mind nor will it accelerate the
|
||||
development.
|
||||
|
||||
####You closed my feature request but I want it really really badly
|
||||
Just write it yourself and send my a pull request. If I like it I will happily
|
||||
merge it if I don't at least you and like minded people get to enjoy it.
|
||||
|
||||
####I need a feature and I need it know
|
||||
I am available for hire. Contact me JID: inputmice@siacs.eu
|
||||
|
||||
###Security
|
||||
####Why are there two end-to-end encryption methods and which one should I choose?
|
||||
In most cases OTR should be the encryption method of choice. It works out of the box with most contacts as long as they are online.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue