sum7/Conversations
sum7
/
Conversations
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

added statement about status and priority to faq

This commit is contained in:
iNPUTmice 2014-07-12 21:31:02 +02:00
parent 4e910eee59
commit e69ac99290
1 changed files with 23 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

29
README.md
View File

@ -95,12 +95,29 @@ detais within Conversations. This will start an add to address book intent with
as payload. This doesn’t require Conversations to have write permissions on your as payload. This doesn’t require Conversations to have write permissions on your
address book but also doesn’t require you to copy past Jabber ID from one app to address book but also doesn’t require you to copy past Jabber ID from one app to
another. another.
####How can I change my status ####Where can I see the status of my contacts? How can I set a status or priority
You can set an account offline by long pressing on it and select temporarily Status are a horrible metric. Setting them manually to a proper value rarly
disable account from the context menu. Other statuses like away, DND and N/A are works because users are either lazy or just forget about them. Setting them
not supported for simplicity reasons. Users tend to forget their status, other automatically does not provide quality results either. Keyboard or mouse
users ignore them and setting the status automatically would mean too much of an activity as indicator for example fails when the users is just looking at
impact on privacy. something (reading an article, watching a movie). Furthermore automatic setting
of status always implies an impact on your privacy. (Are you sure you want
everybody in your contact list to know that you have been using your computer at
4am?!)
In the past status has been used to judge the likelihood of whether or not your
messages are being read. This is no longer necessary. With Chat Markers
(XEP-0333, supported by Conversations since 0.4) we have the ability to **know**
whether or not your messages are being read.
Similar things can be said for priorites. In the past priorties have been used
(By servers, not by clients!) to route your messages to one specific client.
With carbon messages (XEP-0280, supported by Conversations since 0.1) this is no
longer necessary. Using priorities to route OTR messages isn't pratical either
because they are not changeable on the fly. Metrics like last active client
(the client which sent the last message) are much better.
Unfortunatly these modern replacement for lagecay XMPP featurs are not widely
adopted. However Conversations should be an instant messanger for the future and
instead of making Conversations compatible with the past we should work on
implementing new, improved technologies into other XMPP clients as well.
###Security ###Security
####Why are there two end-to-end encryption methods and which one should I choose? ####Why are there two end-to-end encryption methods and which one should I choose?
In most cases OTR should be the encryption method of choice. It works out of the box with most contacts as long as they are online. In most cases OTR should be the encryption method of choice. It works out of the box with most contacts as long as they are online.